Based on something I recently read somewhere, in this post I think I may be pointing out some not all that uncommon construction anomalies with my 1962 Ludwig Jazz Festival snare that’s been in my possession for well over a year already(!)
I hope I am!
After disassembling a bit to do some cleaning I noticed that my bowtie lugs are visually offset towards the snare side, as is the vent hole.
(Well I actually noticed it prior to disassembly)
We’ll get back to that…
I could also never get a good fix on shell depth in the assembled state. Wasn’t 5” but it also didn’t seem to get out to 5.50” either.
So, with rims, tension rods and heads out of the way, I had some measuring to do, right?
My shell is indeed 5.25, or ~1/4” (.25) short of 5 1/2” and it appears lug mount and vent holes were positioned and drilled for a 5 ½” shell.
Measuring the distance from both bearing edges to the end of the lugs the difference averages, call it .40.
Suffice to say that, roughly, were the shell the full 5 1/2", I wouldn't be submitting this post.
What I had read on another forum is that during the transition in the early 60s from the 5 1/2 length to 5" some varying length shells were flying around on the production floor. In my case drilling was setup for 5 1/2 shells when my "shorty" showed up.
And my shell HAD to have been built a 1/4" too short as there is no evidence to suggest some other post shell lay-up weirdness went on.
For instance, both of my reinforcement rings are of equal width.
The error IS visible in the attached shots, sadly from the Reverb sale from which I bought.
Maybe I'll write Ringo and he'll give me $25,000 for it eh? LOL!!
I hope I am!

After disassembling a bit to do some cleaning I noticed that my bowtie lugs are visually offset towards the snare side, as is the vent hole.
(Well I actually noticed it prior to disassembly)
We’ll get back to that…
I could also never get a good fix on shell depth in the assembled state. Wasn’t 5” but it also didn’t seem to get out to 5.50” either.
So, with rims, tension rods and heads out of the way, I had some measuring to do, right?
My shell is indeed 5.25, or ~1/4” (.25) short of 5 1/2” and it appears lug mount and vent holes were positioned and drilled for a 5 ½” shell.
Measuring the distance from both bearing edges to the end of the lugs the difference averages, call it .40.
Suffice to say that, roughly, were the shell the full 5 1/2", I wouldn't be submitting this post.
What I had read on another forum is that during the transition in the early 60s from the 5 1/2 length to 5" some varying length shells were flying around on the production floor. In my case drilling was setup for 5 1/2 shells when my "shorty" showed up.
And my shell HAD to have been built a 1/4" too short as there is no evidence to suggest some other post shell lay-up weirdness went on.
For instance, both of my reinforcement rings are of equal width.
The error IS visible in the attached shots, sadly from the Reverb sale from which I bought.
Maybe I'll write Ringo and he'll give me $25,000 for it eh? LOL!!
Comment