Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shootout: New Audix Fusion Series VS Audix D-Series mics!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shootout: New Audix Fusion Series VS Audix D-Series mics!

    Shootout: New Audix Fusion Series VS Audix D-Series mics!



    Hey guys, here's a shootout that I think will interest a lot of you. As some of you may or may not know, Audix has recently revamped their Fusion series mics. The new Fusion mics are all modeled after their D-series equivalents. Right out of the box they look fantastic, and when you pick them up and handle them they feel like solid, expensive mics! They're even heavier than the D-series mics. A far cry from the old Fusion mics, which felt and sounded like really cheap mics. My friend Andy just bought a pack of these new Audix Fusion mics, and we thought it would be interesting to compare them with the D-series mics we have in our mic locker at the college recording studio.

    So, there is the F6, which is modeled after the popular D6 kick mic:



    The F2 is modeled after the D2:



    There is no F4, but in my shootout I chose to compare another F2 with the D4 on floor tom:



    The F5 is modeled after the i5 snare mic:



    And for overheads I used a pair of CAD Equitek e70 small-diaphragm condenser mics with cardioid capsules:



    This was recorded at the Clackamas Community College Recording studio. I work there as the music tech lab assistant. The kit that was recorded is an Allegra MasterCraft Custom drum set. It has 6-ply Keller Maple shells, which Allegra custom orders - the plies are compressed at 1500psi, instead of the standard 1000 psi, which results in an extra thin shell. The sizes are 10X8 rack tom, 14X14 floor tom (clear Remo Emperors over clear Ambassadors) and 20X16 bass drum (clear Remo PS3 over Evans EQ3 reso). The snare is a 70's Ludwig Acrolite 14X5 aluminum snare (coated Evans G1 over Hazy Ambassador, Puresound Custom 20 wires). The drums were played by yours truely while my friend Andy operated ProTools for the tracking.



    The signal chain was: All mics -> Mogami Starquad XLR -> Digidesign PRE Preamp for close mics/True Systems Precision 8 for overheads -> Digi 192 I/O -> ProTools 8.4 HD. I did my best to match the output levels for the bounced tracks, so you can best objectively compare the clips. No EQ or effects were added. All the audio is 16-bit, 44.1k WAV format. The best way to compare them is to download and import all the files into your DAW. And now the goods:

    A halftime shuffle for the kick mic test with and without overheads.

    F6 (solo) |¦| F6 (+overheads)
    D6 (solo) |¦| D6 (+overheads)

    A long roll plus some hard rimshots for the snare mics.

    F5 (solo)
    i5 (solo)

    A heavy fill featuring the toms with and without overheads for the tom mics.

    F5+F2+F2+F6 (solo) |¦| F5+F2+F2+F6 (+overheads)
    i5+D2+D4+D6 (solo) |¦| i5+D2+D4+D6 (+overheads)

    A short segment of a drum solo to feature all the drums so you can get a feel for each series as a whole.

    e70 Overheads Alone
    Fusion Series with Overheads
    D-Series with Overheads


    Individually, the F5's cost $79, the F2's cost $79 and the F6 costs $139. The FP5 pack, consisting of an F5, three F2's and an F6 costs $329.

    Individually, the i5's cost $99, the D2's cost $129, the D4's cost $169 and the D6 costs $199. The DP5-A pack consisting of an i5, two D2's, a D4 and a D6 costs $659.

    As usual, I will refrain from commenting until later, so you guys can make the comparisons and let me know what you think! How do you think the new F-series stand up to their D-series equivalents? Is the price difference for the D-series mics justified? Please post your thoughts!
    Last edited by thismercifulfate; 10-13-2011, 10:34 AM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by thismercifulfate View Post
    [B][SIZE=4]A heavy fill featuring the toms with and without overheads for the tom mics.

    F5+F2+F2+F6 (solo) |¦| F5+F2+F2+F6 (+overheads)
    i5+D2+D4+D6 (solo) |¦| i5+D2+D4+D6 (+overheads)
    I can hear more lows and better definition all around (imo) with the D series out of this specific example.

    But I will say that I'm surprised by the Fusion series in the examples.

    (Btw, the snare samples didn't show up for me when I clicked on them. But the others all did.)
    Pearl MW/Ref Wine Red with Gold Hardware 18x22 (x2), 16x16, 14x14, 8x12, 8x10, 8x8, 7x6, 5.5x14 snare
    Masterworks: 14x5.5 snare, 6x7 rack tom Pictures post #1
    Reference: Pictures post#1,35,58,68,69
    Pics: http://www.pearldrummersforum.com/album.php?u=92744
    WANTED: Gold Pearl Hardware. PM me.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by drummeric View Post
      I can hear more lows and better definition all around (imo) with the D series out of this specific example.
      yep, me too--D series have much better bass response. The new fusions sound a little thinner, but I admit they sound good. Thank you for sharing.
      sigpic
      Pearl Masters Premium BRP UPDATED
      Masters Studio MBX Make Over-Emerald Mist
      The Masters Army

      Comment


      • #4
        yep...the d-series definitely pack more punch all around.....(which is a relief since i own them)

        however, if i didnt hear them side by side, the new ones probably wouldn't come across as that much weaker...at half the price for a set.

        still, if i didnt have the money, id buy a d6 and an i5 (or an sm57) and save up for a couple of d2s later....

        imho, the d2s are the best of the bunch....they are really hot mics that i have sometimes even used on a smaller kick drum (tom conversion, actually) with great results...

        great drumming, too, btw ....

        Comment


        • #5
          I agree the D series mic's were distinguishly "better" sounding to my ears as well. Great comparison.

          I just sold off my cheapo Nady Mic set and I have been using SM57's on all my toms. I love the 57's but hate the long bulky design mounted on a tom. I was originally looking for a set of E604's but after hearing this I may be just as happy with the D2's. Decisions, decisions.

          Trying to stay on point about the Audix mic's ... whats your preference between the D2 and the E604?
          "The only thing trashier than a wuhan china is an agop china, unless you want to hit some rednecks with your drumsticks" - dudewuttheheck

          Comment


          • #6
            I wonder if we're hearing more bass response because of the D4 vs. the F2 on the floor tom in the whole combination? There wasn't an example of just the rack tom with the D2 vs F2. But on the floor tom, especially, I would (and did) expect the D4 to pick up the bass better than the F2. But it might be a different story with the rack tom.
            Pearl MW/Ref Wine Red with Gold Hardware 18x22 (x2), 16x16, 14x14, 8x12, 8x10, 8x8, 7x6, 5.5x14 snare
            Masterworks: 14x5.5 snare, 6x7 rack tom Pictures post #1
            Reference: Pictures post#1,35,58,68,69
            Pics: http://www.pearldrummersforum.com/album.php?u=92744
            WANTED: Gold Pearl Hardware. PM me.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by randdrum View Post
              I agree the D series mic's were distinguishly "better" sounding to my ears as well. Great comparison.

              I just sold off my cheapo Nady Mic set and I have been using SM57's on all my toms. I love the 57's but hate the long bulky design mounted on a tom. I was originally looking for a set of E604's but after hearing this I may be just as happy with the D2's. Decisions, decisions.

              Trying to stay on point about the Audix mic's ... whats your preference between the D2 and the E604?
              i think you would notice a huge difference w d2s on your toms versus sm57s....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by drummeric View Post
                I wonder if we're hearing more bass response because of the D4 vs. the F2 on the floor tom in the whole combination? There wasn't an example of just the rack tom with the D2 vs F2. But on the floor tom, especially, I would (and did) expect the D4 to pick up the bass better than the F2. But it might be a different story with the rack tom.
                Hey Eric,

                just to let you know, I got 3 D2's for my kit last week. I haven't had much time or use with them, but we are going into the studio to do some quick clip audio tracks for the cover band I'm in. I'll be using them live when applicable too. I did hook them up briefly and fooled around on the kit just to make sure they worked when I got them and I'm liking what I'm hearing. Still need to get the D4 at some point. Thanks for the input---J
                sigpic
                Pearl Masters Premium BRP UPDATED
                Masters Studio MBX Make Over-Emerald Mist
                The Masters Army

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by chilledbongo View Post
                  i think you would notice a huge difference w d2s on your toms versus sm57s....
                  Can you be more specific? SM57's are awesome. How will the D2's be much of an improvement?
                  "The only thing trashier than a wuhan china is an agop china, unless you want to hit some rednecks with your drumsticks" - dudewuttheheck

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by randdrum View Post
                    Can you be more specific? SM57's are awesome. How will the D2's be much of an improvement?
                    if you are happy with them, that's all that matters ....

                    the sm57 response is tailored to be hotter at a different frequency than the sweet spot on toms, which is why you see it widely used on snares, whereas the d2 is tailored to be exactly hottest at the frequency where toms live....

                    i just read an article in a drum mag that showed the frequency response of all these mics in a line graph and you could quite clearly see where the d2 and the sm57, for example, differed in frequency response....unfortunately, i cant find that link right off the bat...

                    the sm57 will definitely mic your toms, which is why it's deemed a major workhorse....ive seen people sing through them.....but the d2 will undoubtedly make the smaller toms sound deeper and fuller....as will the d4 on a floor tom....i use a d2 on the floor and im very satisfied. however, i would bet a d4 would be that much better because it's tailored to the floor tom frequency .....

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks. I appreciate the more detailed response and it all does make good sense. I guess sometimes I see spec's on electronics and they look good on paper but don't work out so good in use. For example, a QSC 18" 1000W active subwoofer deliveres a fuller, punchier, crisper and more satisfying sound than say a budget Gemini 2000W active subwoofer. On paper the Gemini clearly has the better low end frequency range specs and twice as much power from the amp driving it, yet it fails horribly in comparison the the QSC. WHY? Do spec's lie? Is there a "quality" difference in the power output from the amp? Does the speaker cone and box construction make that much difference even though they are also identical in size and spec ratings?

                      This sort of makes me very hesitant to trust any marketing spec's put out by the manufacturer. To the degree that I question why even bother looking at spec's, charts and graphs ... just rely on what your ears tell you. Unable to have first hand experience with the Audix D series mic's myself, it's hard to convince myself they will sound any better than my SM57's regardless of what the spec's and charts show. I'm forced to rely on user reviews which can sometimes be misleading and bias.
                      "The only thing trashier than a wuhan china is an agop china, unless you want to hit some rednecks with your drumsticks" - dudewuttheheck

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by randdrum View Post
                        Thanks. I appreciate the more detailed response and it all does make good sense. I guess sometimes I see spec's on electronics and they look good on paper but don't work out so good in use. For example, a QSC 18" 1000W active subwoofer deliveres a fuller, punchier, crisper and more satisfying sound than say a budget Gemini 2000W active subwoofer. On paper the Gemini clearly has the better low end frequency range specs and twice as much power from the amp driving it, yet it fails horribly in comparison the the QSC. WHY? Do spec's lie? Is there a "quality" difference in the power output from the amp? Does the speaker cone and box construction make that much difference even though they are also identical in size and spec ratings?

                        This sort of makes me very hesitant to trust any marketing spec's put out by the manufacturer. To the degree that I question why even bother looking at spec's, charts and graphs ... just rely on what your ears tell you. Unable to have first hand experience with the Audix D series mic's myself, it's hard to convince myself they will sound any better than my SM57's regardless of what the spec's and charts show. I'm forced to rely on user reviews which can sometimes be misleading and bias.
                        Perhaps TMF can throw a 57 and a D2 on a tom for you and give you side by side comparison. That is of course only if he wants to or has the time.
                        sigpic
                        Pearl Masters Premium BRP UPDATED
                        Masters Studio MBX Make Over-Emerald Mist
                        The Masters Army

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well that would be cool for me and satisfy my own curiosity but not so sure it will be of any help for anyone else here

                          Since I'm really just wanting to go with a lower profile mic and sell off my SM57's, an even better and more helpful comparison for me would be the D2 and the E604

                          The D2 is slightly less expensive but again ... I don't always subscribe to "you get what you pay for". I can tell you that based on TMF's shootout comparison I would have no problem spending the extra cash on the D series Audix over the f series.
                          "The only thing trashier than a wuhan china is an agop china, unless you want to hit some rednecks with your drumsticks" - dudewuttheheck

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Great comparo. Just one note about the bass drum mic positioning - the D6 has to be inside, at least just passed the edge of the reso head hole. This will avoid the turbulence around the capsule caused by the air dislocation. This simple detail can greatly improve the bottom end.
                            My YouTube channel - old school Metal & Progressive.

                            Drum Gear:
                            Paiste, Tama, Oriollo, Trick, Gibraltar, Rhythm Tech, Aquarian, LP, Vater, Turkish Kurak.

                            Recording/Mixing Gear:
                            Mackie 1640i, Senheiser, Beyerdynamic, Audio Technica, Shure, Apple, Logic, Ultimate Ears.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Great work, Sacha.

                              I prefer the sound of the D-series mics as well.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X